Published on: January 16, 2012
New Trends in Philanthropy and Civil Society in China
New Trends in Philanthropy and Civil Society in China
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Essential Background on the Nonprofit, Philanthropic Sector in China
Key Findings: the Good, the Bad and the Murky
A. Recent Developments and Debates
The Impact of Private Foundations on Domestic NGOs in China (Summer 2009)
Changes in the Development of Private Foundations (Fall 2009)
Changes in the China Charity Federation System” (Spring 2010)
International Donors and NGOs Need to Establish an Equal Partnership (Spring 2010)
Grass-roots NGOs Use Special Accounts to Raise Funds (Winter 2010)
Different Opinions at the Second Private Foundation Forum (Winter 2010)
Develop Philanthropy through Debate and Cooperation (Winter 2010)
B. People in the News
The Third Way for NGOs in China: An Interview with Narada Foundation
Secretary-General Xu Yongguang (Summer, 2009)
At the Forefront of Foundation Transparency: An Interview with Zhuang Ailing, CEO of the China Foundation Center (Autumn 2010)
C. Organizations in the News
The One Foundation and Society for Entrepreneurs and Ecology (SEE) as ‘Shell’ Foundations (Winter 2009)
The China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation Internationalizes (Spring 2010)
The Establishment of the China Foundation Center: China’s Foundations Move Toward Greater Transparency (Autumn 2010)
The philanthropy sector in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has come a long way since the 1980s and 1990s, when it was dominated by government-backed foundations or government-organized NGOs (GONGOs). After the Regulations for Foundation Management were issued in 2004, the philanthropy sector saw the rapid growth of private foundations that are now beginning to rival their government counterparts in both numbers and visibility. Over the past few years, some important developments have taken place, stimulated by fundraising controversies in the wake of the 2008 Sichuan and 2010 Yushu earthquakes, and initiatives led by a small group of private foundations to strengthen philanthropy and civil society in China. What are the controversies and debates over fundraising and philanthropy that have emerged in recent years? What has been the government’s response to these debates? What steps have foundations been taking to strengthen trust and accountability in philanthropy? How is the independent, or grassroots, nonprofit or NGO sector being affected by these developments? Will the newly emerging private foundations evolve into supporters of grassroots NGOs and civil society in general?
This special issue, which represents the inaugural publication of China Development Brief (English), covers these important developments, the debates they have engendered in the philanthropy and civil society sector, and profiles some of the major figures and organizations involved. In the future, CDB (English) will continue to translate and publish other articles and special issues online and occasionally in print.
A word is in order about the origin of the articles and the translation/editorial process. All of these articles are translations of Chinese-language articles by China Development Brief (CDB) staff writers, and were published in previous issues of CDB. They were selected by the editor of CDB (English) and translated and reviewed by CDB’s team of translators, edited and proofread. Each article starts with an introduction that summarizes key points, and contains explanatory notes throughout for the reader.
We would like to thank CDB, the Ford Foundation, and our CDB (English) translators and interns for their support. As a translation project of CDB, CDB (English) would not be possible without the support and hard work of CDB staff who invest long hours to report on the nonprofit sector in China. We also appreciate the financial support of the Ford Foundation who believed in us from the very start. Finally, our translations and other resources would not be possible without the work of our volunteer translators, and interns.
You can download a PDF version of this special issue by going to the CDB (English) website, www.chinadevelopmentbrief.cn. If you would like to order a hard copy, please email firstname.lastname@example.org in English or Chinese.
While we are happy to provide a complimentary PDF copy of the special issue, we do need recover the cost of producing this issue, and encourage you to make a tax-deductible (for U.S. residents) donation to CDB. You can make a donation by going to Give2Asia at www.give2asia.org and typing in China Development Brief in the Search box.
Essential Background on the Nonprofit, Philanthropic Sector
What is the Nonprofit Sector in the PRC?
CDB writers tend to assume their Chinese readers (who come mainly from the nonprofit, academic and government sectors) have some understanding of the Chinese nonprofit sector. CDB (English) makes no such assumption and in this section, we explain some essential background information needed to make sense of these articles.
Perhaps the greatest challenge is to define what exactly constitutes the nonprofit sector in the PRC, and what term or terms are used to describe it. Internationally, the nonprofit sector is also known as the voluntary sector, the charitable sector, the third sector and the civil society sector. It refers to organizations, groups, projects, networks that are voluntary, self-governing, not-for profit, and private in nature and that are established with a mission, whether it be to serve their members or to serve the underprivileged.
In the PRC, it helps to make a distinction between the nonprofit sector in theory and the nonprofit sector in practice. The former is smaller and restricted to legal nonprofits. The latter is a more expansive, flexible category that includes legal nonprofits, informal nonprofits, and even quasi-governmental organizations.
The nonprofit sector in theory refers to legal social institutions (shehui zuzhi_____) registered with the Civil Affairs bureaucracy. There are three categories of these social institutions:
- Social Organizations (SOs, shehui tuanti, ____), which are similar to membership associations in the U.S.;
2. Civil Non-Enterprise Institutions (CNIs, minban feiqiye danwei, _______), which are similar to service providers such as schools for migrant children or the handicapped;
3. Foundations (jijinhui, ___).
The 2004 “Regulations on Foundation Management” created a further distinction between “public fundraising foundations” (gongmu jijinhui, _____), which are allowed to raise funds publicly, and nonpublic fundraising foundations (feigongmu jijinhui, ______), which are not allowed to raise funds publicly. Throughout this issue, we use the term “Public Foundation” to refer to the former, and “Private Foundation” to refer to the latter. These terms are not ideal and can be misleading. Public Foundations are so-called because almost all of them are GONGOs, yet there are now a few independent nonprofits that have succeeded in registering as public foundations (e.g. the Amity Foundation and the One Foundation). Most Private Foundations, in turn, are established by private individuals or entrepreneurs, yet some could be GONGOs.
In this universe of nonprofits, some are GONGOs and some are independent NGOs. To generalize, most Public Foundations and Social Organizations are GONGOs, while independent NGOs are more common in the Private Foundations and Civil Non-Enterprise Institutions categories (see Figure 1).
The nonprofit sector in practice refers to a much larger universe of organizations that includes not only the above legally-registered social institutions, but also informal nonprofits and quasi-governmental organizations (see Figure 1). Informal nonprofits refers to the many independent nonprofits that are either registered as for-profit businesses, or unregistered. These nonprofits are businesses in name, but nonprofits in the operation of their organization. (Given that international definitions of nonprofits emphasize their not-for-profit, private, self-governing nature, the notion of GONGOs or for-profit nonprofits is a bit of an oxymoron. But again, this being China, most people tend not to make a fuss about these distinctions.) Finally, even quasi-governmental bodies, such as mass organizations (e.g. the Women’s Federation, Communist Youth League), and public institutions (which include the public universities and research institutes in China) have been known to refer to themselves as nonprofits or NGOs.
Figure 1 The Nonprofit, Philanthropic Sector in China (the size of the circles is meant to suggest the relative size of each group)
Terminology poses another challenge for the layperson. The term “nonprofit”, NGO, and civil society organization, are not used much by the Chinese who prefer “popular organization” (minjian zuzhi, ____), “social organization” (shehui zuzhi), and more recently, “public welfare organization” (gongyi zuzhi_____). Independent nonprofits, however, do like to distinguish themselves from GONGOs by referring to themselves as “popular” (minjian, __) , “grassroots” (caogen, __), or “civil society” (gongmin shehui_____). Because CDB is itself an independent NGO, it uses these terms liberally throughout its articles.
A Brief History of Nonprofits in the PRC
The history of independent nonprofits in China is a relatively short one. Before 1988, the Ministry of Civil Affairs (MCA) had no regulations governing “social organizations” and the notion of nonprofits or NGOs was nearly nonexistent. Any organizations that called themselves nonprofits or NGOs were GONGOs established by party or state organs. There may have been independent organizations in the 1980s but they were “attached” to governmental or quasi-governmental bodies, and did not call themselves nonprofits or NGOs.
The official nonprofit sector emerged in the late 1980s when MCA came out with the first-ever Regulations on Foundation Management in October 1988, and the first-ever Regulations on the Registration and Management of Social Organizations in October 1989. The large majority of foundations and Social Organizations that registered under these new regulations were GONGOs. The regulations required organizations to find a government sponsor if they wanted to register. GONGOs were able to register more easily because their government sponsor was the agency that established them. In contrast, it was difficult for independent organizations that lacked the necessary connections to find a government sponsor.
The 1995 World Women’s Conference in Beijing was another important event because many international women’s NGOs attended and it was at that conference that many Chinese first heard the term NGO. Afterwards, the term NGO began to be used more frequently, even though there were very few independent NGOs in the mid to late 1990s.
The Regulations for Social Organizations were revised and reissued in 1998, along with Provisional Regulations for the Registration and Management of Civil Non-Enterprise Institutions (CNIs). In the early 2000s, more independent nonprofits were able to register as CNIs, but many more were unable to register given the problem with finding a government sponsor. These nonprofits either registered as a business, or remained unregistered. In 2001, three years after the regulation for CNIs was issued, the number of CNIs rose to 82,000 nationwide, compared with 129,000 Social Organizations. By 2010, those numbers had risen to 198,000 and 246,000 respectively (1). There are no official statistics for independent nonprofits registered as businesses or unregistered, but they have grown quickly during the 2000s, and some scholars estimate they number around 200,000 (2).
The Foundation regulations were revised and reissued in 2004, creating for the first time the category of private foundations. Since 2004, private foundations have grown rapidly and, by this year, there were almost as many private foundations as there were public ones. In 2004, there were 892 registered public foundations, and no private foundations. In 2005, there were 721 public foundations and 253 private ones. By the end of 2010, there were 1,101 public foundations and 1,088 private ones.
From these statistics, it is clear that private foundations have spread like wildfire. Their emergence is one of the major stories in the Chinese nonprofit world over the last few years. Perhaps more importantly, a small group of foundations have begun to promote a new kind of philanthropy that seeks to move away from support for government charity projects toward sectors that have traditionally been neglected, such as support for independent nonprofits. It, thus, made a great deal of sense to focus our inaugural special issue on this newly emerging philanthropic sector and its impact on China’s civil society.
Key Findings: The Good, the Bad, and the Murky
Following is an attempt to summarize what the articles say about the main trends and issues. Those who want more details are encouraged to read the articles themselves. With apologies to Sergio Leone, we organize the major findings into positive trends (the good), negative trends (the bad), and trends that point in no particular direction (the murky).
There are a group of foundation leaders committed to increasing transparency, accountability and professionalism in the philanthropy sector, and encouraging foundations to support nonprofits. At the forefront are leaders from Narada Foundation, Vantone Foundation, YouChange Foundation, Tencent Foundation, and Bright China Foundation, among others.
There are a number of initiatives that have emerged in the last two years to promote the above goals: the China Private Foundation Forum which has held two sessions, one in July 2009 and another in October 2010; and the establishment of the China Foundation Center in July 2010.
- Another major initiative not covered in this special issue (although the One Foundation is profiled in one of the articles) is the One Foundation’s registration as a public foundation in January 2011. The One Foundation, founded by the martial arts star, Jet Li, has been a supporter of independent NGOs and made news as the first private foundation to get legal status as a public foundation. It recently received major gifts from four other foundations, and some of China’s wealthiest and most influential entrepreneurs have joined its board.
- The rapid rise of private foundations provides an alternative source of funding for NGOs. This is a positive trend in a climate in which international NGOs are reducing their funding commitments. Whether foundations actually fund these NGOs is another question.
- There is more interest from GONGOs, public foundations, and private foundations in supporting independent nonprofits, especially after the Sichuan earthquake. GONGOs and public foundations are funding more nonprofit projects, and supporting them through the use of special accounts as detailed in some of the articles. Some public foundations and GONGOs, such as the China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation, are carrying out reforms to become more independent.
- Philanthropy in China is still dominated by GONGOs and public foundations with government ties. This sector is also plagued by bureaucratic norms of decision-making, and lack of transparency and accountability.
- There are a number of vested interests in the current philanthropy system – GONGOs and public foundations that enjoy many privileges – that will make the philanthropy sector difficult to reform.
- There are no major breakthroughs in the regulatory environment. Private foundations and NGOs still face major constraints in terms of fundraising, legal registration, capacity building, legitimacy. Most of the regulatory reforms have been minor and have made it somewhat easier for certain categories of nonprofits to register. Certain provinces and cities (e.g. Shenzhen, Yunnan, Beijing, Shanghai, Qingdao) are also experimenting with reforms to better regulate and promote the nonprofit sector.
- The uncertain regulatory environment also pushes foundations to fund projects and organizations in less risky sectors such as education, poverty relief, and environmental protection, and to stay away from areas such as legal aid and advocacy. (The recent crackdown on legal rights and human rights activists has further reinforced this tendency.)
- There is still a gap in philosophy, practice and communication between NGOs and the foundation world. NGOs cultivated close ties with international NGOs and are used to international practices and standards, but Chinese foundations have different ideas and approaches, and are new to grant-making. Private foundations are still trying to figure out their mission, their role, and their direction.
- There are also differences among private foundations. Many foundations are strongly influenced by corporate values and culture and see philanthropy primarily as a way to promote public relations, and government relations. Only a small minority of foundations are committed to social values and addressing social problems as their core mission.
There are debates over the direction in which NGOs and philanthropy should move. Should NGOs cooperate with the government and GONGOs, or seek the grassroots path relying more on international funding? Should foundations engage in grant-making, operate their own projects, or both? Should they do more to support NGOs not just providing project support, but also core support to cover administrative and personnel expenses?
Some foundations and NGOs are now thinking about internationalizing by contributing to international aid efforts, and addressing global issues such as climate change.
It is still early in the process and still unclear whether foundations are willing to become more transparent, accountable, and supportive of NGOs.
1 Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China,
2 See Wang Ming, “The Development and Present Situation of NGOs in China”, Social Sciences in China, Vol.28, No.2 (Summer, 2007), pp.99-100, and Andrew Watson, “Civil Society in a Transitional State,” in Jonathan Unger (ed.), Associations and the Chinese State: Contested Spaces (Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 2008), pp.36-38.
COMPARING CHINA AND THE U.S.: China’s nonprofit sector is still young. It may be growing quickly but is still small compared to the nonprofit sector in developed countries like the U.S. Here are some statistics that provide some perspective:
- The total annual budget for China’s environmental NGOs is about 30-50 million RMB (4.6-7.7 million USD), compared to 3 billion USD in the U.S. Chinese support for environmental NGOs is thus about 1/1000 the level of support for environment NGOs in the U.S., even though China's GDP is one-third of the U.S. GDP
- The United States has about one foundation per 3,000 people, and Taiwan roughly one foundation per 4,600 people. China only has one foundation per 650,000 people.
- The total assets of 1,288 foundations in China in 2009 amounted to about 39 billion RMB, a mere 11% of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s assets.
Source: Articles in this special issue.
The Impact of Private Foundations on Domestic NGOs in China
China Development Brief, no. 42 (Summer 2009)
Liu Haiying, CDB Senior Staff Writer
Translated by Greta Bradford and Holly Snape
Reviewed by Holly Snape
Introduction: This article is part of our special issue on New Trends in Philanthropy and Civil Society in China (Summer, 2011). It examines how the rapid rise of private foundations in China has changed the environment for domestic grassroots NGOs, which traditionally relied heavily on international funding. Chinese foundations, and GONGOs like the Chinese Red Cross, are now beginning to support NGOs, especially in the aftermath of the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, and could serve as an important alternative source of funding. Indeed, their support could be critical to the growth of China’s nascent civil society for two reasons. One is that international funding to China is on the decline. Another is that international funding to Chinese NGOs tends to be viewed by the Chinese government as an effort by foreign governments and organizations to infiltrate Chinese civil society. Funding from Chinese foundations lacks this stigma, and could in theory make NGOs more acceptable to the government.
Of the two kinds of Chinese foundations, particular attention is being paid to private (literally “nonpublic fundraising”) foundations, instead of their public (literally “public fundraising”) counterparts. The distinction between these two kinds of foundations was created by the 2004 Regulations on Foundation Management. By this time, public foundations had been around for a while. Many were founded in the 1980s and 1990s with government backing and are therefore referred to as GONGOs. In contrast, private foundations were made possible by the 2004 Regulations, and they grew quickly in the following years. The main distinction between the two is that public foundations are allowed to raise funds publicly, while private foundations are not. Many public foundations have some form of government backing, and generally get their funds from